Link_Popularity_-_A_Thing_of_the_Past
| Link Popularity - A Thing of the Past?
've found myself involved in a lot of discussions about the
dropping importance of link popularity lately. Numerous people
have said to me that they think incoming links no longer hold as
much weight as they once did, and that the only links worth
obtaining are relevant links. I have to vehemently disagree.
First of all, before Sergey Brin or Larry Page even learned the
word 'algorithm', there were web sites that practiced the fine
art of reciprocal linking. Pre-Google link exchanges served only
one purpose and that was to develop direct traffic from those
links. This still works! Somewhere in our PR worries and link
popularity ambitions, we forgot one important fact : you never
know when the next link you obtain for your site will be a
direct traffic producer. For example moving.ca, provides daily
traffic to www.abalone.ca through a small, text link on their
links page. This does not come up on Google as an incoming link
to Abalone Designs, but it is one our most valuable incoming
links, nonetheless.
Now, as far as your ranking is concerned on Google, links still
hold weight. Search for just about any term or phrase and check
the #1 ranked site's incoming links versus the others. 9 times
out of 10, The first ranked site will have a few more links than
the others. The times when I see lower ranked sites having more
incoming links than the #1 site, generally speaking, the #1 site
has better content, and more of it or this site's incoming links
have anchor text that contain the exact search term or phrase
you searched for and the others don't. It's still the same old
formula. Offer a content-rich, user-friendly site with incoming
links that have relevant anchor text and your site'll do alright.
Relevant anchor text is important, but what about having your
link on relevant sites? Links on relevant sites or pages have
one tremendous bonus and that is targeted traffic. This is
providing, of course, the link produces direct traffic. Other
than that, I say links on relevant pages aren't that much more
important than other links. Take, for example, the incoming
links to seoinc.com - the very first page that shows up on
Google when you search for seoinc.com's incoming links, is
csmonitor.com. A Christian Science magazine! If I'm missing some
link between religion and SEO, please inform me, but otherwise,
these two sites couldn't be more different. Google has deemed
this an important incoming link for seoinc.com, regardless. You
think you know the algorithm, but you don't. You never know when
links will count.
Let's not forget about the other search engines, though. Still a
few steps behind Google, MSN places a lot of weight on incoming
links. So does HotBot, Yahoo! and now, apparently, Become.com.
This is just a handful of places that take a critical look at
your link popularity. And I hate to say it kids, but I think
there's a chance that MSN might slightly outdo Google this year.
As of late, I've noticed different rankings on Google for
clients based on where you're searching from -
geographically-specific search results against our will. I
haven't spoken to one individual who likes this idea. This could
be the giant mistake MSN has been waiting for Google to make,
and you don't want your perfectly Google-optimized site to miss
the MSN bus when it's usage tops Google's.
This brings me to my last point which, quite frankly, is a
no-brainer. The Internet is nothing but a massive network of
links, hence 'net'. To turn your back on this is one of the
hugest mistakes you can make on the web. The more links you have
around the web, the more often your site will be seen. It's just
like the real world, "there's no such thing as bad publicity".
Think of incoming links as cyber-publicity - there's no such
thing as a bad incoming link.
About the author:
Courtney Heard is the founder of Abalone Designs, an Internet
Marketing and SEO company in Vancouver, Canada. She has been
involved in web development and marketing since 1995 and has
helped start several businesses since then in the Vancouver
area. More of Courtney's articles are available at
http://www.abalone.ca/resources/.
|
|