Viewpoint_on_Usability
| Viewpoint on Usability
It's a sad truth that very few Web integrators and interactive
agencies have integrated performance engineers -- those folks
who can analyze, assess, design and test Webb sites for
usability -- into their overall work practices and
methodologies. And even fewer have figured out how to apply
performance engineering to the ever-changing and increasingly
complex nature of web applications. This is anything but an
intuitive process. SIs can't merely dot their offices with a few
people (with or without the right qualifications) and say they
now create "user-centric" websites. As a consumer of e-commerce
services, you need to be able to evaluate the competencies of
your vendors. Do they have the skills, the resources, and the
methodologies in place to design and deliver a highly usable
site? Are they poised to anticipate and meet the challenges of
the ever-changing, complex nature of web applications?
What's in a name?
Human Factors. Human Performance Engineering. Usability.
User-friendly design. User-centric websites. Is there a
difference among these? From a practical standpoint, there
really is not. The science of how humans interact with their
environment and, in our case, with their computer systems, has
taken on many names over the years. "User-friendly" emerged as
the layperson's term for good system ergonomics and, as a
result, it tends to be how most clients and end-users describe
how they want the site designed. They'll say things like, "we
want a scalable, flexible design that is user-friendly." While
this may be stating the obvious, these are good concepts for
clients to be supporting. The important issue is not really the
terms used to describe usability, it's understanding how it can
positively affect the outcome of your e-commerce
initiatives…and, conversely, that, used ineffectively, the
serious impact it can have on your bottom line.
Usability. It's a science.
Usability is a science. Performance engineers are highly trained
experts who combine graduate degrees (usually in Behaviorial
Psychology or a related field) and several years of work
experience in designing and testing the interfaces and processes
associated with computer applications. Seasoned performance
engineers bring an interesting mixture of academic and practical
skills to the project team. And they are, most definitely, an
integrated part of the project team. Performance Engineers
partner closely with the strategists, marketing specialists,
business analysts, content architects, and visual designers to
infuse their thinking (following a defined methodology) into the
overall strategy and design of the site.
Because it's a science, it's measurable.
Usability practices are sound and measurable. First and
foremost, usability should support the ROI of the e-commerce
initiative with tangible benefits. Vendors who make subjective
statements like, "the site will be easier to use" or "your users
will be happier" reduce the value of usability to its lowest
level. Usability and design metrics for the site should be
established early in the planning process with clear ties to
bottom-line performance. This isn't simple tracking of number of
hits and form-based user feedback. Good usability design should
enable:
-Work processes and workflow to be streamlined -Costs to be
reduced or revenue generated -Desired behavior to be predicted
and measured -Competitive differentiation to be defined and
tracked -Service levels to be established -Brand to be built
through a targeted, positive user experience
Simply stated, a well-designed, user-centric web site reflects
the priorities of the business and represents the business model
of the company or organization.
Usability. It's part of the big picture.
For systems integrators and Internet architects, the challenge
is to integrate usability into an e-commerce strategy and
subsequently into a project lifecycle, so that it becomes an
integral part of the overall planning, design, development,
testing, and launch. This is easier said than done. When systems
integrators claim to conduct "usability testing," it's safe to
assume that this is a distinctively separate activity, performed
generally at the END of the project. While this is better than
nothing, of course, it is but not the optimal approach, and it
will offer only limited benefits to the overall product.
User requirements need to be assessed early in the analysis
stage of an e-commerce initiative, so that usability is
considered throughout the project lifecycle. Issues like the
impact on workflow, expectations in navigation, "logical and
intuitive" site design and content management, and the behavior
we want to enable or the expectations we need to design to are
huge considerations. This is combined with the technical
architecture, transactional requirements, and performance
expectations, and is synthesized -- exploited -- to achieve
maximum user benefit in areas such as user profiling and
personalization, dynamic content assembly, and interactivity.
Certainly, usability should never "dumb down" requirements to
the lowest common denominator in an attempt to satisfy "every
user." On the contrary, usability should no longer be considered
as a way to prevent potential problems, but rather, an approach
that realizes greater possibilities. Usability should challenge
and push the envelope equally as hard as the technical,
business, and creative requirements. Only then do we break
through with an innovative, engaging, clever, and effective web
site.
Business Model. That's the bottom line.
Creating a compelling user experience has a direct tie to market
competitiveness. It's fair to say that usability should, in all
cases, support, augment, and enable the realization of the
business model. Happy users aren't the true objective, although
certainly, it's a desirable by-product. Rather, realized
business goals through targeted usability objectives make
usability a straightforward business case.
About the author:
Mimi Brooks, founder, president and CEO of Logical Design
Solutions (www.lds.com), a leading provider of Internet
professional services to the Fortune 500.
|
|